« Collecting Judgments in North Carolina -- What Happens When There is An Appeal? | Main | NC Judgment and Debt Purchasers Beware: Attorneys' Fees Assessed Against Assignees Unaware that Debt Arose From Identity Theft »

03/17/2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I ran across the link below. It's an unauthorized practice of law case in Ohio where the activities described in this article were deemed not to be unauthorized practice of law. They were not bothered by future pay, nor were they bothered by the fact that the purchase agreement stipulated that the judgment would be assigned back to the original judgment creditor if the assignee failed to collect the judgment.

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/Boards/UPL/reports/03_05.pdf

Here's an Ohio case where it was not considered Unauthorized Practice of Law

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/Boards/UPL/reports/03_05.pdf

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Stats